This is the first guest post I’ve hosted! Please welcome Cait McKnelly.
A number of state legislatures are passing legislation outlawing abortion after the twentieth week on the basis of “fetal pain”. This is just one of many, unscientifically founded assertions regarding abortion that are being codified into our laws in different states; laws that are not only founded on mistruths and misunderstandings but, in the end, may actually run counter to their stated purpose. (I’ll get into their actual purpose later in this article.)
Part of the misunderstanding of “fetal pain” has to do with the idea that a developing fetus feels pain the way an adult feels pain. This is an impossibility.
The ability to feel pain is dependent on a functioning neocortex in the brain. It is a part of the cerebrum, or “gray matter” of the brain. This part of the brain doesn’t even begin to develop until midway through the third trimester of pregnancy (approximately 29-30 weeks gestation) and is still not complete at birth. In fact, the neocortex continues to develop after birth until well into adolescence. Because of this, it’s an impossibility for a fetus to feel pain as we feel pain.
This doesn’t mean that a fetus doesn’t react to trauma. Hard coded into a part of the brain called the limbic system, one of the first parts of the brain to develop, are reflexes; crude reactions that are independent of actual sensory stimuli. This means if you poke a fetus in the womb, it will reflexively move away. But does it even “feel” the poke? No. Some of these reflexes stay with us all of our lives; others recede and eventually fade entirely away as the neocortex develops and assumes the jobs those reflexes used to do.
In an odd way, what these laws do is “anthropomorphize” a fetus. I use that term deliberately because, technically, a fetus isn’t a human. It’s a potential human and most fetuses have the ability to eventually become human but they lack all of the defining characteristics of an actual “human”.
Because of these neurological FACTS, anesthesiologists (at least those trained at reputable medical schools) are taught that fetal anesthesia for surgeries and therapeutic abortions isn’t needed prior to the thirtieth week of gestation. Indeed, these facts have often been used to comfort women who have had stillbirths or needed a late term abortion to save their own life or because their fetus had gross abnormalities. It means a great deal to a woman to know that her baby didn’t suffer. Because here is a fact that most anti-abortionists don’t want you to know; any woman that has a late term abortion does so because she has to, not because she wants to do so. Let me repeat that; any woman that has a late term abortion does so because she has to, not because she wants to do so. And the very fact that her fetus can’t feel pain is one of the things that, frequently, keeps these women from suffering more than they have to.
Now, here’s the thing; these laws, ostensibly to “save the fetus pain”, forces a woman to carry to term a fetus that may very well have severe anomalies and gross congenital malformations and will die at birth. This may very well put that fetus into a position of suffering due to it’s deformities. This runs directly counter to the law’s stated “compassionate” purpose. Additionally, a handful of states are actually passing legislation to permit physicians to actively lie to and withhold information from women about the health of their fetus to prevent them from aborting. Other states are passing legislation that deny the right of a physician to declare a fetus unviable.
So why do legislators pass these cruel and inhumane laws? Because they are cruel and they are inhumane. A handful of legislators just might be that naive. But I fully believe that the majority of them know exactly what they are doing. They pass these laws for one of two reasons; either they believe it’s what their constituency wants and they are playing to the lowest common, ignorant denominator for the sake of getting elected; or else their own anti-abortion beliefs are so radically and deeply rooted in their religious beliefs that they will let any woman and any fetus go through incalculable suffering to satisfy that belief. Part of that belief is the need to subject women and to refuse them control of their bodies. They simply cannot trust women to make the “right decision” and they will wrest that control from her no matter the cost.
So what’s the answer?
EDUCATION! The more women (and men too, for that matter) know what lies and mistruths, misconceptions and misinformation are being presented to them by their legislators, the more ammunition there is to fight back and challenge them. LEARN what these people are saying and LEARN whether or not it’s the truth. Wrap yourself in the righteousness of fact as much as they wrap themselves in the righteousness of religion.
Cait McKnelly is a wife of many years, mother of three women and grandmother to four “women someday.” She is a retired RN and for many years nurtured, healed, soothed and accompanied many people on their life journeys, some to that journey’s end. She is now a gardner, computer gamer, crazy cat lady and happy retiree. Currently in her croneship she leads a small group of women called Brighid’s Voice, dedicated to exploring the role of women in the world.
HSP said:
Cait….(and Abbey) thank you thank you thank you. I particularly despise the anti choice arguments that use “fetal pain” to justify their stance because scientifically it just isn’t true as you explained. More often than not, I find it is used as an extremely devisive emotional playing card by the religious right who are convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that their position is right.
I remember specifically asking my doctor if our son would be in any pain….he looked me straight in the eye and assured me that there was just nothing that points to that conclusion. In addition, in our case, his brain was so severely malformed that to assert that pain could it would be felt was just plain absurd. If I made it to term (note I said IF) he would have faced a tortuous short time on earth, unable to swallow, having breathing difficulties, and suffering major system malfunctions. How I could ever let that happen just to avoid the scorn of a group of closed minded religious zealots is beyond me but I digress.
A friend of mine once likened the decision to interrupt a pregnancy due to ppd as akin to making the decision to remove a much-loved family member from life support. I found her analogy to be just about the closest thing to a perfect way to try to help someone who has not walked a day in our shoes to understand our pain, our grief, and our sorrowful decision. We aren’t “sorry” for making the decision, because we know what we did was best. But we ache for the loss of our children plain and simple.
Again, thank you for your contribution Cait.
grannieof2 said:
It’s hard for me to read this sort of article, based in careful, supportable, researched FACT, and realize how truly deliberate and conscious are the efforts of these men. The urge to throttle them, personally, is almost irresistible. I think Cait’s right: their purpose is to silence us, in furtherance of their own personal control dramas writ large. Get up, stand up!!
Thank you, Cait. And thanks, Abbey, for opening the door for truth. Again. 🙂
Sandi said:
I am from Israel, where the abortion debate is not quite so heated. abortion is talked about much less passionately. However Israeli scientists and policy makers also set caps on abortion dates due to scientific evidence of fetal pain, and Israeli medicine and science is widely regarded as one of the best in the world (and I find it a great deal less politicized than American scientific journals). While those who spend less time in the literature and scientific articles in general may be convinced by this article, I have seen other research strongly suggesting the fetus does indeed feel pain, and perhaps great pain between the weeks of 23 – 25 weeks gestation. I think the science is out there if you are willing to look for it, and you can find doctors to tell you both. I think those who support abortion support it regardless of whether or not the fetus feels pain, and those who are against abortion are against it whether or not the fetus feels pain. I try to stay out of the politics, though personally abortion saddens me a great deal, probably because I’m a mom and I’ve carried and I just always had a profound feeling that the fetus was . . . important, somehow. Something I was supposed to . . . protect, cherish. I love women, and am certainly not the least bit religious. While I dont seek to criminalize abortion, I have never been able to find the triumph other women do in abortion. Mostly I see it as unfortunate. Whether the fetus is human or not, or how human, or how much pain . . . I guess I feel the question is: Does the fetus have no value? If not, then I think abortion is negligible. Its not sad, Its not anything. If the fetus has value though, then I do not find abortion to be something to rejoice in. Mostly, it just seems pretty sad to me. I’m also adopted, so I’ve always been personally grateful I wasnt aborted.
KumquatWriter said:
I am interested in your word choice, particularly the words “rejoice” and “triumph.” If you aren’t a native speaker then nevermind, but I don’t think women rejoice in abortion – at least, not at the point the baby is a fetus. I think that plenty of women rejoice at the availability of abortion early in pregnancy. At that phase of development, the distance between clump of cells and human is great and there is zero potential for the life to exist outside of the mother’s body.
In late-term abortion, rejoice is definitely not the right word. Nor is triumph. I think the word I would use is “gratitude.” I am grateful that I was able to spare my son a life of pain and dependency. I carried him to twenty-four weeks, and he unquestionably was cherished and loved and protected. That is why we chose abortion: because we cherished and loved him, we chose to protect him from a life that we would not force on an animal. It was because of his value that we let him go. And although I believe abortion is sad in many (though not all) cases, but I believe it is definitely fortunate that it is a choice.
I’m glad you weren’t aborted too!
Cait McKnelly said:
I don’t want to get into a debate over whose country has the “better science”, however I would like to say that this article was read by a neonatal neurologist who approved of the science in it before it was posted. After it was posted, I received a private message from a person who is a professional research scientist in neurobiology at the University of Washington. She has quite literally spent her entire career studying pain, first doing post doctoral work at Vanderbilt before going to Washington. Her credentials are impeccable. In that message she praised my writing, stating that it was quite definitely a message that more people needed to know as so much legislation is being passed on the basis of what she called “junk science”.
Given those recommendations, I think I will continue to believe what I perceive as the truth.
hspphotography said:
Well it’s a really good thing that you replied before me kumquatwriter cuz I was about to lose my marble over this comment.
I just can’t begin to explain how misconstrued later term abortion due to poor prenatal disgnosis is, and the reader from Israel’s reply is proof of that. There was no “rejoicing” nor feelings of “triumph” in learning that our much loved and desired children had a choice left to us between suffering moments of tremendous pain before dying outside our wombs or being let to rest at stages that THE BEST medical scientists in the world have indicated as “pre-pain gestational age.”
I think the best I can muster without getting ugly this am is, “until you’ve walked a nano second in our shoes it’s probably best not to try to say what you’d decide if faced with the same circumstances.”
grannieof2 said:
Triumph? Rejoice? No. Sad, yes. Grateful for choice, yes.
And that’s all I will say, except: Judgment, which can be initially painful to the recipient(s), ultimately illustrates about the judge.
grannieof2 said:
“…illustrates MORE about the judge.” Should have taken a couple more deep breaths…
Chrissa said:
I came here because of the Supernatural debacle involving a potential con artist. And I discover you’re friends with a very old, dear friend of mine. What a small world we live in! Hello Cait! It’s Chrissa. Glad to see you’re spot on in this debate as always.
Cait McKnelly said:
Hello, Chrissa! It’s good to hear from you 🙂 And quite the surprise! You should give us a call sometime.
Pingback: Life, The Universe and Writer’s Block | Out of Context